Arsenal secured a narrow yet well-earned 1-0 victory over Chelsea in Matchweek 29, with the home side controlling much of the game. The decisive goal came in the 20th minute, courtesy of Mikel Merino, who pounced on a loose ball in the box to slot home past Robert Sánchez. Chelsea struggled to create meaningful chances throughout, as their attacking efforts were stifled by Arsenal’s defensive structure.
Key Stats Breakdown
Arsenal recorded 13 shots compared to Chelsea’s 8, with the Gunners accumulating an xG of 1.81, significantly higher than Chelsea’s 0.65. Despite the disparity in quality chances, Arsenal only managed one goal, as Chelsea’s defense and Sánchez limited further damage.
Chelsea had a slight edge in possession (54% vs. 46%), but their build-up play lacked efficiency, reflected in their only two shots on target, neither of which troubled David Raya. Arsenal, on the other hand, created four shots on target, showing greater attacking intent despite having less of the ball.
Match Momentum
From the start, Arsenal dictated the tempo, as seen in the xG progression chart. Their early pressure led to Merino’s goal in the 20th minute, a period where they dominated proceedings. After the goal, Arsenal continued to push but lacked the finishing touch to extend their lead. Chelsea’s response was muted, with only a few minor spikes in xG, mostly in the second half, but their best opportunities were comfortably handled by the Arsenal defense.
Shot Analysis
Arsenal’s shot map highlights their proactive attacking approach, with 9 shots inside the box compared to Chelsea’s 7.
Chelsea’s biggest issue was converting their half-chances, as their two shots on target did little to challenge Raya. Their best opportunity came from a central position just outside the six-yard box, but the effort was blocked before reaching goal.
Possession Tactics
Chelsea’s pass map reflects their struggles in progressing the ball forward efficiently. The bulk of their passing activity remained around their defensive third and midfield, with very few penetrating passes into the attacking zones. Arsenal, by contrast, were more direct, using quick combinations between Řdegaard, Rice, and Martinelli to break through Chelsea’s lines.
Arsenal’s ability to stretch Chelsea’s midfield and exploit spaces in wide areas was evident, with Trossard and Martinelli involved in key attacking transitions. The hosts’ progressive passing was superior, helping them maintain territorial dominance, even if their finishing left room for improvement.
Final Thoughts
A controlled and disciplined performance from Arsenal saw them claim an important three points against a lackluster Chelsea side. The visitors will be frustrated by their inability to create high-quality opportunities, while Arsenal can be satisfied with a professional display. While the scoreline suggests a close contest, the underlying numbers paint a picture of Arsenal’s dominance in key attacking areas.