West Ham edged out Wolverhampton Wanderers in a tight 2-1 victory at the London Stadium in Matchweek 14 of the Premier League. The Hammers clinched the win with clinical finishing, while Wolves showcased resilience but lacked the sharpness needed to overturn the result.
Stat Breakdown
The stats reflect a balanced contest, with West Ham attempting 19 shots to Wolves’ 18. West Ham recorded an expected goals (xG) tally of 1.65, slightly behind Wolves’ 1.79, highlighting Wolves’ higher shot quality. However, it was the Hammers who made their chances count, converting two critical moments into goals.
West Ham had 53% possession, utilizing it to create 39 touches in the Wolves’ box, compared to Wolves’ 20. Wolves, however, focused on counter-attacking opportunities but often struggled to capitalize.
Momentum Analysis
The match momentum chart shows a game of fluctuating dominance. West Ham had the upper hand in the opening and closing stages, while Wolves mounted pressure in the middle of the second half, resulting in their lone goal by Matt Doherty in the 69th minute. Despite this resurgence, West Ham’s composure ensured they held on for the win.
Shots and Goals
West Ham were more efficient in front of goal. Their shot map highlights goals from Sou?ek (53’) and Bowen (71’) from close range, illustrating precise finishing despite a lower xG per shot.
Wolves had numerous attempts, but with 13 off-target shots, their execution left much to be desired.
Passing and Possession Tactics
West Ham’s pass map reveals their reliance on central playmakers, with Tomáš Sou?ek and Carlos Soler orchestrating attacks. The fullbacks Emerson Palmieri and Wan-Bissaka frequently overlapped, creating width.
Wolves’ pass map reflects a more compact style, with João Gomes and Matheus Cunha pivotal in transitioning play. However, their lack of final-third penetration hindered their effectiveness.
West Ham’s efficiency and game management secured them three vital points, keeping their top-half aspirations alive. Wolves, meanwhile, showed flashes of promise but must improve their end product to climb out of mid-table mediocrity.