A fiercely contested match at Craven Cottage saw Fulham and Arsenal share the spoils in a 1-1 draw. Fulham struck first through Raul Jimenez in the 10th minute, with a clinical finish from a set-piece. Arsenal responded early in the second half, with William Saliba netting a towering header off a well-timed cross. Despite dominating possession, Arsenal struggled to break through Fulham’s compact defense, as both sides ultimately settled for a point.
Key Stats
Possession: Arsenal dominated with 65%, compared to Fulham’s 35%.
Shots: Arsenal 11, Fulham 2.
xG: Arsenal 1.56, Fulham 0.52.
Passes Completed: Arsenal 553, Fulham 297.
Momentum Analysis
The match momentum swung heavily in Arsenal’s favor, particularly in the second half, as shown in the cumulative xG chart. Arsenal’s xG of 1.6 highlighted their consistent pressure, but Fulham’s resolute defensive structure and early goal ensured they remained in the game, capitalizing on one of their rare attacking chances.
Shots and Goals
Arsenal registered 11 shots, with an xG of 1.56, but their finishing left much to be desired, converting only one of their four shots on target. Their shot map indicates a reliance on central opportunities, with Saliba’s goal coming from one of the three chances inside the box.
Fulham, meanwhile, managed just two shots in the entire game, one of which was Jimenez’s goal, which carried an xG of 0.26. Their efficiency was remarkable, converting half of their attempts into goals.
Possession Tactics
Arsenal’s pass map revealed a well-structured build-up, with Jorginho orchestrating play from deep, supported by Declan Rice and Martin Ødegaard in advanced positions. Their play heavily favored combinations on the right flank involving Bukayo Saka and Thomas Partey, but they found it difficult to penetrate Fulham’s disciplined low block.
Fulham’s approach was starkly different, as shown in their pass map. They relied on long balls and quick transitions, with Adama Traoré and Alex Iwobi providing width. Their midfield trio of Sander Berge, Saša Lukić, and Emile Smith Rowe focused more on defensive duties than progressive play.